MAGAZINE QUESTIONNAIRE - AUGUST 2010
 
Please fill in this form and click on the 'Submit' button below if you want your views to be taken into account in the review of our magazine. Please note that this feature should be used by members only, which is why we are asking for some form of identification. We reserve the right to disallow any response which appears not to come from a genuine club member.
 
E-mail Address: *
Name
Membership number (if known)
In this and the next three questions, please rank your reasons for reading Railway Ramblings (1 is least important, 4 most). The magazine is interesting/provides a good read. * 1 - least important
2
3
4 - most important
The magazine is informative on current activities, e.g. the forthcoming walks programme. * 1 - least important
2
3
4 - most important
The magazine is educational, e.g. includes articles about line histories, current developments, etc. * 1 - least important
2
3
4 - most important
The magazine is interesting for other reasons (please specify in next question). 1 - least important
2
3
4 - most important
If you have other reasons for reading the magazine (see above), please state here what they are.
How much detail do you wish to see about each forthcoming walk in the future walks programme? * Full detail as in Autumn 2010 magazine
Summary as in Summer 2010 magazine
Calendar list only
With increased access by many members to the Internet, would an electronic version of Railway Ramblings (with colour images) be preferable? * Yes
No
No strong view
Should the magazine use a larger font? * Yes
No
Should the magazine use a more modern font such as Arial (used in this questionnaire)? * Yes
No
Should the page size of the magazine be increased to A4? * Yes
No
Would you prefer more or less pages per issue? * More
Less
Same
Is some of the content more suited for the clubs website or for separate issue annually, e.g. schedules of important bridges and viaducts? * Yes
No
Do not mind
For the last 12 months of magazines, please rate the editorial content from 1 to 5 (1=least enjoyed, 5=most enjoyed) * 1 - least enjoyed
2
3
4
5 - most enjoyed
For the last 12 months of magazines, please rate the letters to the editor from 1 to 5 (1=least enjoyed, 5=most enjoyed) * 1 - least enjoyed
2
3
4
5 - most enjoyed
For the last 12 months of magazines, please rate the articles on disused UK lines from 1 to 5 (1=least enjoyed, 5=most enjoyed) * 1 - least enjoyed
2
3
4
5 - most enjoyed
For the last 12 months of magazines, please rate the news items from 1 to 5 (1=least enjoyed, 5=most enjoyed) * 1 - least enjoyed
2
3
4
5 - most enjoyed
For the last 12 months of magazines, please rate the walk reports from 1 to 5 (1=least enjoyed, 5=most enjoyed) * 1 - least enjoyed
2
3
4
5 - most enjoyed
For the last 12 months of magazines, please rate the articles on disused overseas lines from 1 to 5 (1=least enjoyed, 5=most enjoyed) * 1 - least enjoyed
2
3
4
5 - most enjoyed
For the last 12 months of magazines, please rate the programme of future walks from 1 to 5 (1=least enjoyed, 5=most enjoyed) * 1 - least enjoyed
2
3
4
5 - most enjoyed
For the last 12 months of magazines, please rate the miscellaneous articles (e.g. about different aspects of railways) from 1 to 5 (1=least enjoyed, 5=most enjoyed) * 1 - least enjoyed
2
3
4
5 - most enjoyed
Which areas of the magazine would you like to see more of?
Which areas of the magazine would you like to see less of?
Are there any areas of railway rambling or general railway interest not covered adequately or not at all that you would like to see included (regularly or occasionally)? * Yes
No
If you replied Yes to the previous question, please provide details of content that you feel is not adequately covered at present.
If you have any other comments which have not been addressed by the questions above, please enter them here
Verification Code:
Enter Verification Code: *
* Required